Michael Arrington is a slick Internet entrepreneur and well-paid for TechCrunch’s stamp of approval on technology. However, Arrington isn’t a journalist. Companies know that. His readers know that. And Democratic U.S. Presidential candidate Barack Obama knows it. That knowledge is probably why Obama “answered” some of Arrington’s questions about various technology policy issues.
Notice, answered is in quotes.
I wasn’t in Obama’s office when his staff received Arrington’s e-mail, but here’s a likely scenario:
Obama’s computer: <Ding! You’ve Got Blogger’s Mail!>
Staffer: ‘Obama, some blogger has some geek questions. Should I delete it like I did with that Sutherland fellow’s?
Obama: ‘Wait. This is Michael Arrington - he has a huge audience of geeks, who might not all be voting for Ron Paul. What sort of questions is he asking?’
Staffer: ‘Oh, softball questions like should the Internet be free, do you believe in privacy, and your stance on net neutering.’
Obama: ‘He must mean net neutrality. This is perfect. He’s not asking about that dumb statement about my foreign policy or why a first-term senator is running for the highest elective office in the land.’
Staffer: ‘We have that issue paper we send out to all the kids — that’ll do, right?’ (blow dust off yellowed document.)
Obama: ‘Sure. It’s not like I’ll be asked any follow-up questions.’ (Throws dart at ‘Hill and Bill’ photo.)
Without follow-ups, interviews are a monologue, a blog without comments.
Some follow-ups I would have like answered:
Q: You say you are a fierce supporter of net neutrality. But what about the Internet carriers that find themselves carrying ever-greater loads of data made even more daunting by the avalanche of multimedia transferred online. Carriers have to pass on the costs somehow — if not to the Google’s of the world, it will be to the grandma down the block forced to pay higher connection fees because everyone wants to become the next YouTube.
Q: You say you will prevent abuse of individual privacy by government data-gathering measures. Does this mean you will vote against Congress’ willingness to provide President Bush with sweeping blanket warrants to tap your phone and Internet connections? Do you support Mr. Bush’s demand AT&T and other technology providers involved in the warrantless wiretap programs be immune from lawsuits? If, as it seems, Congress will approve some form of the blanket wiretap bill, will you fight for its renewal?
Q: Do you support calls to provide unlimited H1B1 visas, such as that made by Bill Gates? H1B1s are often used by foreign employers to bring in more foreign employees, paying them less that U.S. engineers and scientists. Do you feel H1B1s should be tightened to remove that loophole? Are companies using the H1B1 as a way to prevent hiring more expensive U.S. candidates?
Those are just a few follow-ups. Until blogs become more like traditional media and learn proper interviewing, they will remain simply media mini me’s.